Thursday, January 28, 2010

Haiti: Justice v. Compassion


It was inevitable - Haiti has left the headlines. Today is the first day the New York Times has not echoed the fight for survival in Haiti. It seems the Apple Tablet is now more interesting. We are moving on. For those left in the wake, now is the time to differentiate between compassion and justice.
David Brooks was initially correct in his January 14th New York Times article when he states, “this is not a natural disaster story. This is a poverty story.” However, Mr. Brooks then proceeded to construct a Eurocentric narrative effectively blaming Haitian society for allowing an earthquake devastate their island: “responsibility is often not internalized. Child-rearing practices often involve neglect [. . .] some cultures are more progress-resistant than others, and a horrible tragedy was just exacerbated by one of them.” Labeling a country such as this a perpetuation in paternalistic compassion – feeling sorry for Haiti because they are not as enlightened as their Western, white neighbors. But, Haiti continues to fight back by issuing a call for justice, not simplified compassion.


The earthquake has catalyzed a critical discussion on international aid effectiveness in a country plagued by structural oppression.
The disaster is not as natural as the news sound bites would have us think. Earthquakes of the same scale have hit places such as California and Japan, and these areas have successfully bounced back. We can give Haiti a chance to become a San Francisco or Tokyo by calling for systemic change. Please start fighting for justice by signing the petition to cancel Haiti's debt and rebuild with grants, not interests tainted with loans.

Even in the wake of the disaster, tourism continues to turn a profit from Haiti. Cruise ships such as the one from Royal Caribbean dock on protected Haitian beaches. The fact that armed soldiers are stationed to defend vacationers from starving, desperate survivors should be an indication of compromised ethics! Even with some passenger refusing to disembark, the company continues to parade their floating cities around the beaches, turning the Haitian fight for survival into another market, “poorism.”

The best advice on an appropriate response to Haiti comes from Alanna Shaika in Nobody Wants Your Old Shoes: How Not to Help in Haiti. She outlines suggestions such as: do not go to Haiti and use vital resources needed by the local people and do not give old, expired or worthless goods blocking the importation of needed medicines and supplies. In addition, a favorite organization that has been consistently recommended is Partners in Health, the organization co-founded by the infamous Dr. Paul Farmer. Another effective aid organization is charity:water who gives 100% of public donations to water projects. Lastly, it is important that a cycle of dependence is not perpetuated. Now is the time to employ local Haitian talent to rebuild their beautiful country. As the hype fades and human-interest pieces echo less miraculous stories, the international community must remain in solidarity with the Haitian people. We have shown our support with the overflow of donations, now we must sustain it.

_____________________


The best advice on Haiti has come from Alanna Shaikh in
Nobody Wants Your Old Shoes: How Not to Help Haiti

Recommended Organizations: Partners in Health (co-founded by the infamous Paul Farmer)
charity:water (100% of the proceeds used)
"Find a charity you can trust" Charity Navigator
Or text Haiti to 90999 for a $10 donation to the Red Cross

As it starts to become increasingly difficult to find news on Haiti, blogs seem to be a strong alternative.
Tales From the Hood is currently on the ground and reporting back as a veteran aid worker.



A version of this post was originally written for the Furman newspaper, The Paladin in February, 2010

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

McToursim

tour⋅ist
–noun

a person who is traveling, esp. for pleasure.




After 34 hours - 26 in a plane, 1 transnational & 2 international flights - I am writing from Australia as an official tourist. I am embracing this label like never before. I needed a break.

After my exams, I had to move out of the cabin and was turning in my key and talking to the RA on duty. We were discussing his trip to S. Africa over the summer and my coming one. I asked if the trip influenced him in wanting to work in Africa and he said he thought about international business. My reflex answer was "ethically?" I later apologized for my cynicism and introduced myself. My Christmas holiday started at that exact moment.

I decided to take my vacation to reflect on my experiences with tourism. How would it compare to Bosnia? Australia has the tourist model down, but the constant theme of consumerism is frustrating. (I have 28 minutes of my computer battery and only half a latte before McDonald's kicks me off their "free wifi.") Theme of the trip: first world tourism requires not only consumerism, but corporate materialism. Four weeks in and six left in the Balkans, considering myself and a veteran of guided tours, I chose to take the mature route. I started taking photos of other travelers. This game has since jumped the border and started down under.

The Winners from the Balkans:



The Classic


Best Dressed

camera + tripod carrier




Touring War


At least my brother tried to blend in


My family as tourists

My favorite: combat boots + matching outfit + backpack with 3 locks!
(He was a professional)

From Australia:


I wish I had some profound conclusion on tourism other than I support it. After all, I am destined to be a chronic one. I spent three months in the Balkans confused while I played both tourist and sojourner. I came to realize that war is now for sale in Bosnia and wondered if sustainable tourism is truly possible. They have turned the disgusting conflict into a new market. If people are willing to buy pieces of the war, at least they will have a souvenir that provokes. If a trip is collapsed into a quest for the ultimate purchase or coolest photo for that year's Christmas card, then why leave home? Where is the line between poorism/"hug-an- orphan-vacations" and informed pilgrim? If people visit a slum as a poorist, it should catalyze critical questions around systemic poverty, structural oppression, etc.
I think we start by looking for the fight/struggle of that country. There is always a pulse below the surface.